RWood wrote:Which might indicate part of the reason the Tekapo area is about 5-10% sunnier than Omarama, even though its rainfall is a little higher with the Alpine overspill being closer.
Nope. It has more to do with topography than altitude. When the prevailing W/NW wind is blowing, a low cloud shear line forms along the edge of Lake Pukaki, caused by the immediately adjacent Ben Ohau range which happens to be aligned with the Lake.
Areas south of that line are to some degree sheltered from the wind which prevents the low cloud layer from being disrupted, so cloud covers the area south of that line and it is blown away north of it.
Also there are two common inversion layers which form over the Mackenzie: one around 600-1000m and the other at approximately 1,300-1,700m. Obviously when you are below those you are under cloud. Get above them and it's usually fine.
At 720m Lake Tekapo township occasionally
just squeaks out above the lower one, but not often. If the low altitude layer is the only one present then Tekapo has a slight chance of being in sunshine when the more southern areas haven't. But if only the higher altitude layer, or both layers, are present, then everybody below those altitudes has overcast skies.
I've been driving up Benmore Peak and been between the two layers and it's a fascinating sight. Crystall clear air between two seemingly-endless cloud layers. The main divide looks like a wall, as it disappears from view into the upper layer. Then you break out of that and into clear blue sky and the only thing you can see is the tops of the higher mountains, such as the Alps.
In those cases everything else is clouded in. Lake Tekapo's extra 300m of altitude has little to do with its slightly higher rate of clear skies. Mostly it's due to that shear line along the Pukaki-Ben Ohau Conversion Zone© (I just invented that name). If the Ben Ohau range and/or Lake Pukaki weren't aligned the way they are there would be even less difference in the number of clear skies the two areas experience.
These are things you notice when you are building an observatory at 1,900m. But anyway we were discussing other wind-related myths...