Misleading headline

Archive of NZ Weather & Climate
Forum rules
These topics are a read-only archive and may be subject to out-of-date information.

For today's weather discussion head to: New Zealand Weather & Climate
RWood
Posts: 3745
Joined: Sat 24/01/2004 16:56
Location: Wellington
Has thanked: 188 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Misleading headline

Unread post by RWood »

http://www.stuff.co.nz/4676683a11.html

Good grief! It's the central pressure of the anticyclone that is supposed to be record-breaking - not the "wild weather"! #-o q-
User avatar
Michael
Posts: 7210
Joined: Thu 27/03/2003 12:04
Location: Rainy Manurewa, Auckland - "City of Gales"
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by Michael »

Probably refering to the pressure gradient caused from the intense high bringing the rain etc.
Razor
Moderator
Posts: 5121
Joined: Fri 10/02/2006 15:14
Location: Halswell, Christchurch
Has thanked: 717 times
Been thanked: 923 times

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by Razor »

Yes I thought that headline was reflective of some of the sensationalist and sometimes disgracefully informed reporting we have been seeign at times lately
Christchurch Rocks
Manukau heads obs
Posts: 12305
Joined: Mon 10/03/2003 16:30
Location: West Coast Road, Manukau Peninsula, North Island
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by Manukau heads obs »

actualy you are missing the point I think
when you get a very big high pressure system like that, it can create extreme weather conditons around its permiter (i.e by causing blocking, lots of moisture feed, etc)
Image
Brian Hamilton, weather enthusiast. My weather dataEmail: [email protected]
RWood
Posts: 3745
Joined: Sat 24/01/2004 16:56
Location: Wellington
Has thanked: 188 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by RWood »

No, the point has not been missed. There will be nothing exceptional about the winds or rain in the affected areas - as BobMcD. said in the article, Fiordland is used to such rainfalls, New Orleans isn't. It's simply a very bad headline, designed to sell a few more copies of papers or get more online attention.

Trouble around the periphery does not constitute record-breaking. Unless rainfalls somewhere top about 600mm or winds blast at over 160kph there will be nothing exceptional about the weather in Fiordland/Westland/inland Canty.

It is simply a sensationalist headline, hoping to ride on the coattails of recent weather publicity.
Razor
Moderator
Posts: 5121
Joined: Fri 10/02/2006 15:14
Location: Halswell, Christchurch
Has thanked: 717 times
Been thanked: 923 times

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by Razor »

well said RWood =D>
Christchurch Rocks
melja
Posts: 2202
Joined: Sun 11/06/2006 20:57
Location: Waikawa, Picton
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 74 times

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by melja »

Um they do expect 500mm+ in those areas so i dont no about you but thats exceptional and does not happen very often.
RWood
Posts: 3745
Joined: Sat 24/01/2004 16:56
Location: Wellington
Has thanked: 188 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by RWood »

The 500 is a "could" for the whole event over about 3-4 days (see MetService warning). Considering the 1-day record is 682mm and the 2-day 1049mm, "exceptional" is not appropriate.
melja
Posts: 2202
Joined: Sun 11/06/2006 20:57
Location: Waikawa, Picton
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 74 times

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by melja »

Yes but they were 14 years ago! and i cant find once at arthurs pass since 2003 that they have had 500mm+ in one event, so if it happens every year then no its not exceptional but it doesnt happen all that often, rarely does this kind rain event happen in the alps! it may happen in south westland but not the alps further north.
Razor
Moderator
Posts: 5121
Joined: Fri 10/02/2006 15:14
Location: Halswell, Christchurch
Has thanked: 717 times
Been thanked: 923 times

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by Razor »

Arthurs Pass township is slightly east of the divide and sees significantly less than the main divide even though it is just down the road. The measure an annual average up to (or even more than) 10,000mm on the Divide, I understand its a few thousand less for the village. And you go just 10km further east to bealy and its less than 2000mm.

So a warning of 500mm over a few days on the main divide is not unusual, especially in sping (what the locals call the "monsoon season"!)
Christchurch Rocks
RWood
Posts: 3745
Joined: Sat 24/01/2004 16:56
Location: Wellington
Has thanked: 188 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by RWood »

Just so. On the upwind side of the divide, there's a cluster of recorders in the catchment south/SE of Hokitika with means ranging up to 11,500+mm/year at the Cropp River "waterfall" site. That is not South Westland, either.
melja
Posts: 2202
Joined: Sun 11/06/2006 20:57
Location: Waikawa, Picton
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 74 times

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by melja »

http://www.metservice.com/default/index ... es&pr=1016

Now they are calling it amazing not exceptional and note they say a good amount of it will fall on the eastern flanks of the canterbury alps so if we see 350-400mm fall that the arthurs pass web site is expecting then this is exceptional rain for them.
Namytnap
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon 18/08/2008 18:32
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by Namytnap »

Around and around waiting for the counter reply.!!
NZ Thunderstorm Soc
Posts: 18488
Joined: Wed 12/03/2003 22:08
Location: Raukapuka Geraldine
Has thanked: 1769 times
Been thanked: 1412 times

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by NZ Thunderstorm Soc »

Michael wrote:Probably refering to the pressure gradient caused from the intense high bringing the rain etc.
I would in some ways agree with Michael on this one :smile:
About the article, you would have to ask, Micheal Forbes, the writer of the article, why the intense pressure of the anticyclone is the cause of the heavy rain?
Well he wrote it :smile:

JohnGaul
NZTS
JohnGaul
NZThS
RWood
Posts: 3745
Joined: Sat 24/01/2004 16:56
Location: Wellington
Has thanked: 188 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by RWood »

The Met. headline should not have used "amazing" to describe 500mm in 2-3 days in the area referred to. As for Arthurs Pass, the site that has records from 1906 has recorded as much as 1418mm in a month and although 350-400mm in the timespan given would be very high, it would certainly not be "amazing" or "record-breaking". I'm not going to expend my time downloading the data just to work out the return period for such an event. Goodbye, and thanks for all the fish.
Inny Binny
Posts: 553
Joined: Sat 01/09/2007 12:15
Location: Prebbleton
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by Inny Binny »

I don't think it's worth the time to worry over the semantics between 'very high' and 'amazing'.
Pelorus Pete
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue 04/12/2007 11:16
Location: Mahau Sound - Pelorus Sound
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by Pelorus Pete »

Can anyone tell me - are we (inner Pelorus Sound) the only ones getting rain.
Had 44mm thus far and still raining, nothing heavy (for us) but steady rain.
My www sites are showing rain on West Coast - but nothing great at this stage, and beggar all else where ???
Even the rain radar dosn't show us having rain of that amount ???
Gary McConnochie
Posts: 165
Joined: Sat 13/11/2004 15:36
Location: West Melton
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by Gary McConnochie »

If you look at this site you will indeed see you are not the only one with rain.

http://www.crc.govt.nz/Our+Environment/ ... -table.htm
Pelorus Pete
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue 04/12/2007 11:16
Location: Mahau Sound - Pelorus Sound
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by Pelorus Pete »

Thanx Gary
Another site to my collection !!!!
Don't supose you have other Enviroment locations ???
Manukau heads obs
Posts: 12305
Joined: Mon 10/03/2003 16:30
Location: West Coast Road, Manukau Peninsula, North Island
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by Manukau heads obs »

the sounds hills would block low level rain from the wellington radar too I would think (i.e rain from low cloud)
Image
Brian Hamilton, weather enthusiast. My weather dataEmail: [email protected]
Razor
Moderator
Posts: 5121
Joined: Fri 10/02/2006 15:14
Location: Halswell, Christchurch
Has thanked: 717 times
Been thanked: 923 times

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by Razor »

A lesson in point for those who don't understand the effect of the Main Divide

http://www.wcrc.govt.nz/river_level_rai ... ummary.htm shows the Cropp River (one of the sites mentioned earlier in this thread) with 559mm and counting from this event. Falls of up to even 1000mm a week can occur at this site, esepcially during the spring norwest season, which we appear to be in now.

Over the Main Divide and a bit further north, we have Arthurs Pass village. Just 4km east but only 155mm so far in the same system. To the south, also close to the Main Divide, Mt Cook has just 75mm

In recent years 3 metre snow dumps in a day or two are not uncommon high on the main divide. This is why the Franz and Fox glaciers are able to advance while east of the divide retreat continues with haste

While these totals seem huge to townies who don't know the Southern Alps, they are reasonably common in the mountains (as mentioned especially in spring) and certainly nothing for the media to get hysterical about and compare to destructive hurricanes (for eg)

Should be some good infill for the lakes though, with more to come when the snow thaws.
Christchurch Rocks
OzMike
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat 30/08/2008 14:05
Location: Exmouth/Learmonth Western Australia
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by OzMike »

There was a record high presure reading (approaching 1040hPa) on Western Australia's south coast, at Esperance, recently. There was also a record low temp (for WA) of -7.2 degrees at Eyre a few hundred kms from Esperance around the same time.
Manukau heads obs
Posts: 12305
Joined: Mon 10/03/2003 16:30
Location: West Coast Road, Manukau Peninsula, North Island
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by Manukau heads obs »

I think it was basicly that same high that gave eastern NI record high baro?
Image
Brian Hamilton, weather enthusiast. My weather dataEmail: [email protected]
Manukau heads obs
Posts: 12305
Joined: Mon 10/03/2003 16:30
Location: West Coast Road, Manukau Peninsula, North Island
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by Manukau heads obs »

I see the metservice weather warnings says:
This will
bring rainfall totals to 650-750mm in some places for this event
to my thinking, I think it was premature and over the top to say that the news headline was grossly misleading
Image
Brian Hamilton, weather enthusiast. My weather dataEmail: [email protected]
RWood
Posts: 3745
Joined: Sat 24/01/2004 16:56
Location: Wellington
Has thanked: 188 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Re: Misleading headline

Unread post by RWood »

Manukau heads observer wrote:I see the metservice weather warnings says:
This will
bring rainfall totals to 650-750mm in some places for this event
to my thinking, I think it was premature and over the top to say that the news headline was grossly misleading
The headline clearly said that the "wild weather" could be record-breaking. The body of the article said no such thing. That's misleading - and that's simply Logic 101 and English 101, as far as I'm concerned. It's all part of the hype machine. q-
Locked