weather forecasting when experts can't agree on what happene
Posted: Sun 16/12/2012 18:52
In light of the discussion that got terminated earlier today, I thought I like to ask about the reliability of weather forecasting when experts can't agree on what happened in the immediate past. Forecasting derives from studying patterns from the past, comparing existing patterns with them and projecting forwards.
How could reliable forecasting of what is yet to happened have certainty when experts (and amateurs) can't agree as to what actually happened in the recent past with the benefit of objective evidence?
How could reliable forecasting of what is yet to happened have certainty when experts (and amateurs) can't agree as to what actually happened in the recent past with the benefit of objective evidence?