Uh-oh!
Posted: Thu 29/06/2023 18:16
Really!! Hail falling straight down would do just as much damage as a stone driven on a slight angle, after all a stone of that size is hardly likely to be effected much in its free fall by wind given its weight.Bloomberg suspects that high winds drove large hailstones into the Scottsbluff panels, which exceeded their hail resistance limits.
I think they were likely referring the strong downdrafts often associated with thunderstorms. They mention a 'terminal velocity' of 240 km/h - the maximum speed an object will reach when falling due to air friction. However, if that object was accompanied by a strong downdraft of say 200 km/h, this would substantially reduce the amount of air friction around the object, allowing it to fall much faster. That lack of friction may also reduce the normal surface smoothing of what may have originally been a more jagged composite type of hailstone, making it more damaging than a smooth hailstone. So probably more a case of the solar panel's design limits being exceeded, rather than 'manufacturers cutting corners'. Having said that, you'd think that creating a solar farm in the middle of the US's hail capital is just asking for trouble.Richard wrote: ↑Sat 01/07/2023 09:42 Love this bit -Really!! Hail falling straight down would do just as much damage as a stone driven on a slight angle, after all a stone of that size is hardly likely to be effected much in its free fall by wind given its weight.Bloomberg suspects that high winds drove large hailstones into the Scottsbluff panels, which exceeded their hail resistance limits.