Uh-oh!
- TonyT
- Moderator
- Posts: 2941
- Joined: Thu 08/05/2003 11:09
- Location: Amberley, North Canterbury
- Has thanked: 361 times
- Been thanked: 1264 times
-
- Posts: 18805
- Joined: Wed 12/03/2003 22:08
- Location: Raukapuka Geraldine
- Has thanked: 1888 times
- Been thanked: 1482 times
Re: Uh-oh!
If the hailstones were of the "Gorilla" type, the damage would be more severe.
JohnGaul
NZThS
NZThS
- Richard
- Posts: 8576
- Joined: Tue 14/07/2009 07:32
- Location: Medbury, Inland North Canterbury
- Has thanked: 1800 times
- Been thanked: 868 times
Re: Uh-oh!
Love this bit -
This is clearly a case of the manufacturers cutting corners, corruption. We are seeing this elsewhere in this so called green movement, like the 1000's of new fully registered electric cars abandoned in paddocks in China just to claim subsidies.
Really!! Hail falling straight down would do just as much damage as a stone driven on a slight angle, after all a stone of that size is hardly likely to be effected much in its free fall by wind given its weight.Bloomberg suspects that high winds drove large hailstones into the Scottsbluff panels, which exceeded their hail resistance limits.
This is clearly a case of the manufacturers cutting corners, corruption. We are seeing this elsewhere in this so called green movement, like the 1000's of new fully registered electric cars abandoned in paddocks in China just to claim subsidies.
- Nev
- Moderator
- Posts: 6316
- Joined: Tue 07/03/2006 15:24
- Location: Waiheke Island, Hauraki Gulf
- Has thanked: 502 times
- Been thanked: 1146 times
Re: Uh-oh!
I think they were likely referring the strong downdrafts often associated with thunderstorms. They mention a 'terminal velocity' of 240 km/h - the maximum speed an object will reach when falling due to air friction. However, if that object was accompanied by a strong downdraft of say 200 km/h, this would substantially reduce the amount of air friction around the object, allowing it to fall much faster. That lack of friction may also reduce the normal surface smoothing of what may have originally been a more jagged composite type of hailstone, making it more damaging than a smooth hailstone. So probably more a case of the solar panel's design limits being exceeded, rather than 'manufacturers cutting corners'. Having said that, you'd think that creating a solar farm in the middle of the US's hail capital is just asking for trouble.Richard wrote: ↑Sat 01/07/2023 09:42 Love this bit -Really!! Hail falling straight down would do just as much damage as a stone driven on a slight angle, after all a stone of that size is hardly likely to be effected much in its free fall by wind given its weight.Bloomberg suspects that high winds drove large hailstones into the Scottsbluff panels, which exceeded their hail resistance limits.
- Richard
- Posts: 8576
- Joined: Tue 14/07/2009 07:32
- Location: Medbury, Inland North Canterbury
- Has thanked: 1800 times
- Been thanked: 868 times
Re: Uh-oh!
Good point Nev, but I think there is diffidently inconsistency in the manufacturing when you have one 100% undamaged panel next to a totaled panel. If it was down to the speed and shape of the stone the damage would be far more evenly spread.