Lightning Data for USA
-
- Posts: 11333
- Joined: Mon 10/03/2003 19:38
- Location: Grey Lynn, Auckland
Lightning Data for USA
I found this interesting. Would be interesting to know comparative figures for NZ. Met Service do collect this type of data.
top ten states according to flashes per square mile 1995-2006 according to Vaisala, who runs the National Lightning Detection Network, and the NWS.
1. Florida 26.3
2. Louisiana 21.1
3. Mississippi 18.4
4. Alabama 16.5
5. South Carolina 14.8
6. Tennessee 14.4
7. Indiana 14.3
8. Georgia 14.2
9. Oklahoma 13.8
10. Missouri 13.7
top ten states according to flashes per square mile 1995-2006 according to Vaisala, who runs the National Lightning Detection Network, and the NWS.
1. Florida 26.3
2. Louisiana 21.1
3. Mississippi 18.4
4. Alabama 16.5
5. South Carolina 14.8
6. Tennessee 14.4
7. Indiana 14.3
8. Georgia 14.2
9. Oklahoma 13.8
10. Missouri 13.7
-
- Posts: 2363
- Joined: Sun 18/01/2004 18:59
- Location: Omarama
Re: Lightning Data for USA
I guess Indiana is the standout in that list, although the southern part is right down there with the others...so maybe it's not the standout, unless the strikes were mainly in the northern part...


-
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Wed 04/01/2006 11:45
- Location: Perth, Western Australia
Re: Lightning Data for USA
This doesn't suprise me, really, given 5 of the top 8 are all near the Gulf of Mexico...lots of hot, humid, unstable air in those parts (ok, SC can be considered near the Gulf as well, even though it doesn't directly border the Gulf, but close enough)...Indiana does stick out...go figure...still interesting figures, thoughNZstorm wrote:I found this interesting. Would be interesting to know comparative figures for NZ. Met Service do collect this type of data.
top ten states according to flashes per square mile 1995-2006 according to Vaisala, who runs the National Lightning Detection Network, and the NWS.
1. Florida 26.3
2. Louisiana 21.1
3. Mississippi 18.4
4. Alabama 16.5
5. South Carolina 14.8
6. Tennessee 14.4
7. Indiana 14.3
8. Georgia 14.2
9. Oklahoma 13.8
10. Missouri 13.7

-
- Posts: 12305
- Joined: Mon 10/03/2003 16:30
- Location: West Coast Road, Manukau Peninsula, North Island
-
- Posts: 2363
- Joined: Sun 18/01/2004 18:59
- Location: Omarama
Re: Lightning Data for USA
Heck yeah. I'd hate to be a comms tech in the southern states! I wonder how much gear has to be replaced every year due to lightning damage?gllitz wrote:This doesn't suprise me, really, given 5 of the top 8 are all near the Gulf of Mexico...lots of hot, humid, unstable air in those parts (ok, SC can be considered near the Gulf as well, even though it doesn't directly border the Gulf, but close enough)...Indiana does stick out...go figure...still interesting figures, though
-
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Wed 04/01/2006 11:45
- Location: Perth, Western Australia
Re: Lightning Data for USA
I reckon!!! Haven't googled it, but my guess would be in the 10's of millions...Gary Roberts wrote:Heck yeah. I'd hate to be a comms tech in the southern states! I wonder how much gear has to be replaced every year due to lightning damage?gllitz wrote:This doesn't suprise me, really, given 5 of the top 8 are all near the Gulf of Mexico...lots of hot, humid, unstable air in those parts (ok, SC can be considered near the Gulf as well, even though it doesn't directly border the Gulf, but close enough)...Indiana does stick out...go figure...still interesting figures, though

-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4443
- Joined: Sat 14/06/2003 16:18
- Location: Darwin, Australia: Storm city
I'm actually a bit suprised New Mexico isn't on that list.
But yeah, I guess during Summer, the moist feed from the Gulf takes over from around this time of year until September over the southeast.
http://thunder.nsstc.nasa.gov/images/HR ... te_cap.jpg
No suprises on where the most lightning-prone region is. (Waikato
)
That little area of cyan around coastal Otago is interesting... and also the vacancy of annual strikes over northern Hawke's Bay. I would've expected a few more strikes over Northland... maybe the MetService's data will vary a bit?
But looking at that world map, just goes to show NZ is a very fickle place for thunder.
Could be worse though living in Scandinavia, Scotland/Ireland, Iceland, Alaska, Egypt! 
But yeah, I guess during Summer, the moist feed from the Gulf takes over from around this time of year until September over the southeast.
Yes some of that data would be interesting. NASA collect a bit of sparse data from satellite regarding flash count... here's the high-res map.NZstorm wrote:I found this interesting. Would be interesting to know comparative figures for NZ. Met Service do collect this type of data.
http://thunder.nsstc.nasa.gov/images/HR ... te_cap.jpg
No suprises on where the most lightning-prone region is. (Waikato

That little area of cyan around coastal Otago is interesting... and also the vacancy of annual strikes over northern Hawke's Bay. I would've expected a few more strikes over Northland... maybe the MetService's data will vary a bit?
But looking at that world map, just goes to show NZ is a very fickle place for thunder.


-
- Posts: 11333
- Joined: Mon 10/03/2003 19:38
- Location: Grey Lynn, Auckland
-
- MetService Meteorologist
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Sat 15/03/2003 10:59
- Location: Upper Hutt, NZ
I should be able to get you some NZ data, but I'm off work for the next few days, so it may take a week or so. Waikato is actually not NZ's lightning capital. The west coast of the South Island wins easily (maximum is near Ross), and even in the North Island, from memory I think that places like eastern Bay of Plenty (east of Opotiki) and possibly the southwestern part of the North Island have more strikes per annum.
-
- Posts: 11333
- Joined: Mon 10/03/2003 19:38
- Location: Grey Lynn, Auckland
-
- Posts: 10200
- Joined: Sun 29/06/2003 22:39
- Location: Mt Eden Auckland