Re: Canterbury Thunderstorms 6th Janauary 2017
Posted: Fri 06/01/2017 21:44
Some flashes and rumbles here in Amberley in last 15 mins, plus a burst of very heavy rain (not hail) which has now eased back.
But it must be over, Facebook told me it was...Razor wrote:Lightning over the back of the Port Hills just now. Show ain't over yet!
NZ Thunderstorm Soc wrote:Nothing observed from here and not much as regarding spherical recordings, so I'm giving this event as a non-event here, despite the promising outlook and isolated reports of lightning and it's associated sound, being recorded in various places around the Canterbury region today..
There were lots of factors which made this a very scattered and not an eventful event due to the NW coming through, with lowering humidity levels and the high surface pressure hindering possible development of fruitful onshore development.
I think there will be other chances this month with better scenarios for good thunderstorm development with the current weather patterns .
Use the Lightning trackers as a rough guide at best.Richard wrote:Just been talking with a bloke from Greta Valley who reckon that the storm was the best he's seen in the 40 years living there, but whats interesting so little CG's shown on Blitzortung where there were a lot of ground strikes he said.
One thing with New Zealand Lightning that I have noticed with the data coming back from Blitzortung is that our Lightning especially on Mediocre setups like yesterday is that the amperage from the Lightning strikes is very weak and the the wave that is created doesnt travel much before it cant be picked up at all.Richard wrote:Just been talking with a bloke from Greta Valley who reckon that the storm was the best he's seen in the 40 years living there, but whats interesting so little CG's shown on Blitzortung where there were a lot of ground strikes he said.
Interesting that the Metservice want absolutely nothing to do with thunderstorms for Canterbury today? I wonder whether we are missing something?NZ Thunderstorm Soc wrote:Actually, today looks a better day for thunderstorms than yesterday, with conditions etc. on the surface.
No Risk today as upper atmosphere is too stable thats why and sfc dps are too low in relation to the sfc temp.Bradley wrote:Interesting that the Metservice want absolutely nothing to do with thunderstorms for Canterbury today? I wonder whether we are missing something?NZ Thunderstorm Soc wrote:Actually, today looks a better day for thunderstorms than yesterday, with conditions etc. on the surface.
Yes, it was an interesting fact that there were thunderstorms around, yesterday, but generally the day was a warm NW day and any thunderstorm activity was a side issue to the thunder symbol that they had on their website for Christchurch for most of the day, yesterday.Bradley wrote:
Interesting that the Metservice want absolutely nothing to do with thunderstorms for Canterbury today? I wonder whether we are missing something?
That makes a lot of sense Tim, so its the fact that we are a set of small islands that limits amperage, so even though NZ discharges are weak when compared to continental landmasses has that nothing to do with frequency of strikes as last night they were going off every 5 to 10 seconds. Thats the part i dont under stand, the amperage is weak the discharges were frequent.Tornado Tim wrote:One thing with New Zealand Lightning that I have noticed with the data coming back from Blitzortung is that our Lightning especially on Mediocre setups like yesterday is that the amperage from the Lightning strikes is very weak and the the wave that is created doesnt travel much before it cant be picked up at all.Richard wrote:Just been talking with a bloke from Greta Valley who reckon that the storm was the best he's seen in the 40 years living there, but whats interesting so little CG's shown on Blitzortung where there were a lot of ground strikes he said.
More stations need to be added in NZ if this is to be fixed.
It just the kind of thing that's unique to NZ from other countries, as this problem doesn't exist in the States or Europe where there is a larger landmass and thermal distribution is much greater giving rise to better convection and lapse rates, which then in turn gives stronger lightning waveforms.
But yes as Simon mentioned, Lightning networks should be used as a guide, but they will only get better if more people participate in them.
5 to 10 seconds is not frequent compared to what happens in continents where a good storm cell will put out multiple strikes per second (IC as well as CG). A decent NZ cell can produce lightning every 2-3 seconds but this summer season has been lacking.Richard wrote: so its the fact that we are a set of small islands that limits amperage, so even though NZ discharges are weak when compared to continental landmasses has that nothing to do with frequency of strikes as last night they were going off every 5 to 10 seconds. Thats the part i dont under stand, the amperage is weak the discharges were frequent.
Indeed, MS do not own/operate one.Nev wrote:Pretty sure that Transpower own the lightning detection network that MS use…